Finance
North to South finance issues underly nearly all of of the major areas under negotiation for the post-2012 climate protection regime. Under the FCCC signed in Rio in 1992, in recognition of their responsibility for the vast majority of the global warming pollution in the atmosphere, developed countries committed to provide financial support to the developing countries to address both adaptation costs and the incremental costs of their low carbon development1, a commitment that has not been met from the perspective of developing countries. Under the 2007 Bali Action Plan that framed the mandate for negotiations in Copenhagen, developed countries again agreed that developing country actions were to be enabled and supported by finance provided by developed countries.
Developing countries maintain that significant new and additional sources of financial support are essential to cover the costs of climate adaptation, forest protection, and mitigation activities to help put developing countries onto a low carbon development path, through renewable energy deployment and more efficient technologies. Estimates of the scale of the need vary significantly, though is estimated to be well in excess of $150B/year to support both emissions mitigation and adaptation efforts.
The scale of need and form of financial support being put on the table by developed countries represents not only a substantial negotiating point for Copenhagen, but would have significant real world impact on how much emissions growth occurs in the coming decade. With approximately 75% of the growth in global energy demand estimated to come from developing countries over the next 20 years, developing countries will continue to make substantial investments in their energy infrastructure. Without adequate financing, many developing countries could become “locked-in” to much higher carbon development path.
Key finance questions on the table for Copenhagen:
- Scale of financial support needed;
- Amount of new support being committed and timetable (including “fast-start” support);
- Where the support is coming from (Public vs. Private; Special Assessments);
- Who should contribute (Developed vs. Developing Countries)
- What mechanism or institution is managing and deciding what activities are funded.
- UNFCCC Articles 3.1, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5, 4.8, and 4.9 ↩
Featured Finance Content
World Economic and Social Survey 2009 - November 30, 2009
“The separation in practice of the climate change and development agendas has distorted the global debate on the two biggest policy challenges facing the international community. According to the World Economic and Social Survey 2009, an integrated approach based on the concept of sustainable development is urgently needed…To date, the concept of development has too often remained in the background during the evolving climate debate. As a result, the discussions concerning both normative issues (invoking “common but differentiated responsibilities”) and financial ones (entailing how to fund mitigation and adaptation) have become polarized. Moreover, the discussion on creating policies and programmes to support the greening of catch-up growth has hardly started.
The Survey seeks to bridge this gap within the public policy debate. It argues that mitigation and adaptation efforts can move forward effectively only if they are part of a consistent development strategy built around a massive investment-led transformation along low-carbon, high-growth paths.”
–Description from the UN report page.
Finance Reports
- World Economic and Social Survey 2009 - November 30, 2009
“The separation in practice of the climate change and development ... More... - Economics of Adaptation to Climate Change Study Overview - December 1, 2009
Economics of Adaptation to Climate Change Study Overview–World Bank The ... More... - World Development Report - November 30, 2009
“Developing countries can shift to lower-carbon paths while promoting development ... More...
Finance Links
Financing Climate Protection
| Country | Estimate of Need or impact of Proposal | Proposal for Addressing Financing Need | Specific Commitments Made |
| African Group |
Need:At least $67B/year for adaptation $200B/year for mitigation by 2020 (.5 GDP of Annex II Parties) |
Who: Commitments by developed countries for public and private sector finance, with major source from public sector. | |
| AOSIS |
Impact:AAU Auction: $15-25B/Yr Aviation & Marine Auction (Tuvalu): $28B/yr |
Where: Auctioning of AAUs under convention(Norway); (Tuvalu: Auctioning of Marine & Aviation Allowances) Mechanism: Multilateral Fund for Climate Change under UNFCCC |
|
| G77 & China |
Need:Contributions at level of 0.5-1% GDP for developed countries |
Where: Assessed contributions from developed countries. Who: Annex I countries to provide bulk of necessary financing Where: Multilateral Climate Technology Fund (MCTF), supported by technical panels. (Only funding under authority of COP will count toward financial commitments from developed countries) |
|
| European Union | Impact:100€B/year in 2020 for adaptation & mitigation. |
Amount: 22-50B€/year from public funds. Remainder from carbon market offset purchases and private finance. Who: All but Least Developed Countries(LDC), based on GDP and historic responsibility, and level of emission reduction commitments. |
Fast Start: 5-7€B/year pre-2013. |
| Mexico | Impact:Minimum of $10B for initial phase | Establishment of World Climate Change Fund, requiring all governments to contribute based on formula reflecting the size of each nation’s gross domestic product, greenhouse gas emissions and population. (SIDS/LDCs excluded) | |
| Norway | Impact:Auction could generate $15-25 B/yr, (revenue highly dependent on level of Annex I Targets.) | As compliment to other funding contributions, proposal that 2% of AAU (pollution allowances) issued under post-2012 agreement be auctioned, with revenue used toward climate protection activities in developing countries. Recent report on Norway’s Proposal (Sept 2009) | |
| Switzerland | Impact:$18B/yr for adaptation | Fossil fuel tax of $2 per Ton/Co2, with exemption of 1.5 T C02 per capita. FCCC/AWGLCA/2008/MISC5, p. 94-100. | |
| United States(see Annex IX) |
Mechanism: Create Global Fund for Climate, governed by balanced board of donor & recipient, utilizing existing institution as trustee. Who: All countries but LDCs |
| UN/NGO Estimates: | Report Name & Date | ||
| UNFCCC |
Adaptation:$60-182B Mitigation: $200-210B |
UNFCCC: Investment and Financial Flows to Address Climate Change (October 2007) |
|
| UNDP | Adaptation: $86 B/Yr | Human Development Report 2007/2008 Fighting climate change: Human solidarity in a divided world | |
| Oxfam International | Adaptation: $50 B/Yr | “Turning Carbon Into Gold”, December 2008 | |
